Tarot and Kabbalah?

General
21

I love the sentiment of deepening one’s practice, though I’ve found that sometimes going deeper doesn’t mean adding more layers…it can mean stripping them away.

When I first encountered the Kabbalah correspondences, I felt like I should learn them to be a ‘real’ reader. But my intuition kept pulling me back to the cards themselves, to sitting with their images and letting them speak without filtering through another system. Depth came from trust, not from complexity. I still occasionally glimpse connections to the Tree of Life in certain spreads; they arise naturally rather than being imposed. Your practice deepens when you honor what genuinely resonates, whether that’s Kabbalistic structure or pure intuitive flow.

The cards have their own wisdom to share, and they’ll guide you to whatever additional knowledge serves your path.

1 Like
22

I wish I’d taken that approach instead of diving headfirst into trying to memorize which Sephirot connects to what and ending up with a brain full of Hebrew letters I can’t pronounce and zero actual understanding. It took me embarrassingly long to realize I was just collecting trivia instead of building a meaningful practice. When I finally stepped back and worked with the cards on their own terms first, then looked at the Tree of Life separately, suddenly things clicked that never would have if I’d kept forcing the ‘official’ correspondences.

Now I use a weird hybrid system that would probably make Golden Dawn purists weep, but it actually works for my readings in a way the textbook stuff never did.